एक तरफ इलाहबाद हाई कोर्ट की ट्रिपल बेंच टीईटी के अंको का शिक्षक भर्ती में वेटेज की बात कहती है दुसरी
तरफ अभ्यर्थीयों के बीच जानकारी का अभाव है ,
हमारे ब्लॉग पर समय समय पर एन सी टी ई , टी ई टी व इलाहबाद हाई कोर्ट की सही जानकारी उपलब्ध कराई जाती है ,
और हमारा किसी भी अभ्यर्थी से दुराभाव या विरोध नहीं है अपितु सही जानकारी लोगो को मिले जिस से सबका भला हो सके
देखीये क्या है न्यूज़ -
टीइटी मेरिट को न बनाएं चयन का मापदंड
Updated on: Sun, 07 Jul 2013 05:58 PM (IST)
प्रतापगढ़ : टीइटी
उत्तीर्ण बीएड अभ्यर्थियों की बैठक में अध्यक्षता कर रहे ज्ञानेश तिवारी
ने कहा कि प्राथमिक शिक्षक भर्ती प्रक्रिया में टीइटी की मेरिट को चयन का
मापदंड न बनाया जाय क्योंकि यह एक पात्रता परीक्षा है।
उन्होंने कहा कि पिछले दो वर्षो से 72825 शिक्षकों की भर्ती प्रक्रिया रुकी
होने से टीइटी पास बीएड डिग्री धारक परेशान हैं। अंजनी कुमार सिंह ने कहा
कि प्रदेश सरकार को चाहिए कि इसका शीघ्र ही कोई स्थाई हल निकाले, जिससे
रुकी हुई प्रक्रिया पुन: शुरू हो सके। अंत में दो मिनट का मौन रख कर
उत्तराखंड आपदा में मारे गए लोगों को श्रद्धांजलि अर्पित की गई। इस मौके पर
पुनीत तिवारी, अखिलेश सिंह, शशिकांत मिश्र, शैलेश सिंह, विनय कुमार शुक्ल,
आशीष शुक्ल आदि रहे
News Sabhaar : Jagran (7.7.13)
*******************************************
एन सी टी ई ने कहा है कि टी ई टी अंकों को चयन में वेटेज दीया जाये -
9(b) should give weightage to the TET scores in the recruitment process;
however, qualifying the TET would not confer a right on any person for recruitment/employment as it is only one of the eligibility criteria for
appointment
टी ई टी अंकों के सुधार / वृद्धी हेतु , अभ्यर्थी पुन : परीक्षा में बैठ सकते -
See :
Frequency of conduct of TET and validity period of TET certificate :-
11 The appropriate Government should
conduct a TET at least once every year. The Validity Period of TET
qualifying certificate for appointment will be decided by
the appropriate Government subject to a maximum of seven years for all
categories. But there will be no restriction on the number of attempts a
person can take for acquiring a TET Certificate. A person who has qualified TET may also appear again for improving his/her score.
अगर ये ये पात्रता परीक्षा है, तो अंकों के सुधार का क्या मतलब
****************************
इलाहबाद हाई कोर्ट की ट्रिपल बेंच ने टी ई टी मामले पर क्या कहा है -
Our
court is fully aware of the huge problems that are being faced in this
branch of elementary education with the influx of temporary methods of
providing instruction through teachers like Shiksha Mitra and
Preraks. In this background, the emphasis of quality teachers attains
more importance.
This norm therefore cannot be diluted. Apart from this, the State Government has to take notice of the fact that weightage has to be given in the recruitment process as well
We wish to clarify that the binding effect of the notifications and the guidelines is such that the weightage which is contemplated under the guidelines dated 11th February, 2011 cannot be ignored. The minimum score that is required of a candidate is 60% to pass the teacher eligibility test. A concession of 5% has been made in favour of the reserved category candidates including the physically challenged and disabled persons.
This norm therefore cannot be diluted. Apart from this, the State Government has to take notice of the fact that weightage has to be given in the recruitment process as well. It is for the State Government to suitably adopt the said guidelines and we do not wish to add anything further at this stage as we are only concerned with the essentiality of the qualification of the teacher eligibility test to be possessed by any candidate aspiring to be appointed as a teacher.
We wish to make it clear that the law has to be followed in the manner in which it has been legislated. It cannot be diluted on account of the inaction of the State. In such circumstances all teachers whose appointment relate to the period after 23.8.2010 have to be possessed of TET.
This norm therefore cannot be diluted. Apart from this, the State Government has to take notice of the fact that weightage has to be given in the recruitment process as well
We wish to clarify that the binding effect of the notifications and the guidelines is such that the weightage which is contemplated under the guidelines dated 11th February, 2011 cannot be ignored. The minimum score that is required of a candidate is 60% to pass the teacher eligibility test. A concession of 5% has been made in favour of the reserved category candidates including the physically challenged and disabled persons.
This norm therefore cannot be diluted. Apart from this, the State Government has to take notice of the fact that weightage has to be given in the recruitment process as well. It is for the State Government to suitably adopt the said guidelines and we do not wish to add anything further at this stage as we are only concerned with the essentiality of the qualification of the teacher eligibility test to be possessed by any candidate aspiring to be appointed as a teacher.
We wish to make it clear that the law has to be followed in the manner in which it has been legislated. It cannot be diluted on account of the inaction of the State. In such circumstances all teachers whose appointment relate to the period after 23.8.2010 have to be possessed of TET.
There
also the word qualification came up for consideration and the apex
court after having noticed the requirement came to the conclusion that
there has to be a uniform scrutiny of all the candidates as they are
possessed of educational and training qualifications from different
sources.
The questions that have been therefore framed by us are answered as follows:-
1.
The teacher eligibility test is an essential qualification that has to
be possessed by every candidate who seeks appointment as a teacher of
elementary education in Classes 1 to 5 as per the notification dated
23.8.2010 which notification is within the powers of the NCTE under
Section 23(1) of the 2009 Act.
2.
Clause 3(a) of the notification dated 23.8.2010 is an integral part of
the notification and cannot be read in isolation so as to exempt such
candidates who are described in the said clause to be possessed of
qualifications from the teacher eligibility test.
3.
We approve of the judgment of the division bench in Prabhakar Singh's
case to the extent of laying down the interpretation of the commencement
of recruitment process under Clause 5 of the notification dated
23.8.2010 but we disapprove and overrule the ratio of the said decision
in relation to grant of exemption and relaxation from teacher
eligibility test to the candidates referred to in Clause 3 (a) of the
notification dated 23.8.2010, and consequently, hold that the teacher
eligibility test is compulsory for all candidates referred to in Clause 1
and Clause 3 (a).
Let the judgement be accordingly placed before the respective benches for appropriate orders.
Source : http://elegalix.allahabadhighcourt.in/elegalix/WebShowJudgment.do?judgmentID=2617665
